I am breaking out of vacation mode from this blog because a really terrible thing may be on the verge of happening.
Please know this is not hyperbole. Yes, many terrible things have happened this year – the unjust decision in the Trayvon Martin case, the shooting of little children in Newtown, the continued plundering of our economy, to name just a few.
But this is the kind of terrible thing that will likely set off a global chain of destructive, violent consequences that may not have an end, or at least a merciful end.
As you’ve probably seen in the news by now, the use of chemical weapons in Syria has resulted in the deaths of hundreds if not thousands of people in that country. There are conflicting viewpoints about who is responsible for the use of these weapons, many saying the Syrian government is to blame, the government blaming rebel forces. Either way, it is a terrible situation there, in a country that has been torn apart by civil war, and where more than 100,000 have been killed and nearly 2 million refugees have fled to neighboring countries since 2011.
What might happen if the U.K., the U.S., and other nations go ahead with military action, as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has hinted at? Well, again from the NYT, Iran has warned that it will launch a retaliatory attack on Israel. Russia has warned of “catastrophic consequences.”
Actions have consequences. This is how karma works. We can argue until we are blue in the face about how the consequences are wrong or not justified, but they will still happen. Many, many people stand to be injured or killed by this chain of reactions. Some are saying this has the potential to turn into World War III.
According to today’s New York Times,
Prime Minister David Cameron said Britain would push the United Nations to hold Syria responsible for last week’s chemical attack and authorize “all necessary measures” to protect civilians.
We can guess what Cameron means by this.
But what if instead of guessing we imagined something different?
What if “all necessary measures” meant something else? What if it could include:
- Sending a massive peace army to Syria not with arms but with presence and skillful means to de-escalate the situation. There is such an entity, by the way: the Nonviolent Peace Force.
- Economic sanctions.
- Meeting with President Bashar al-Assad and engaging in dialogue.
- Arresting President al-Assad and using the International Criminal Court system to investigate what’s going on.
- Dropping love bombs on Syria… they might include food, clean water, medicine, and atropine, the antidote for gas attacks.
- Sending medical aid.
What else? I know there is more. Leave your idea in the comments below.
Sure, some of these ideas may be naïve, some may not work or be counterproductive. I don’t know.
But the point is – can we break out of our binary mind that thinks of “response” only in terms of attacking or defending with military arms?
Right now, the most powerful peacemaking tool you have is your own imagination and your ability to communicate and share those ideas with others.
If one of those others you want to share with is President Obama, you can reach him in these ways:
- Comments: 202-456-1111
- Switchboard: 202-456-1414
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Please also see this excellent page from the Friends Committee on National Legislation to find out how to directly contact your congressional representative in multiple ways…. the message is “Slow Down”!