RSS Feed

Category Archives: War and Peace

First-hand Account from Thailand

Posted on

My friend Anchalee Kurutach, a native of Thailand and a board member of the Buddhist Peace Fellowship, posted this on her Facebook page earlier today. She translated this account from a peace volunteer in Bangkok who wrote this at 2 am, April 11. Even though we don’t hear much about it in the mainstream media, there is actually a significant nonviolent movement in that country, in the midst of all the turmoil.

******************

I walked away from the protest area exhausted. My physical strength would return soon but my spirit has been lost in the wind of violence that has swept us today.

Before leaving, we the peace volunteers sat down together for some noodles and thought about what we could do next. A friend suggested that we go visit the injured at the hospital tomorrow.

These words hit me hard. I remember the Black May event. What my friends and I did then was to go give blood and visit the injured. That was the first time I ever saw people being hurt from a demonstration. We visited them over and over.

Throughout the time we have been working (as peace volunteers) since the beginning of this protest, people have been suspicious that we are the yellow-shirts in disguise, the red shirts, or the elite. I would like to let you know that my inspiration to become a peace volunteer comes from my not wanting to see people getting hurt and die anymore from political conflicts.

The sound of monks chanting for the dead could be heard from the stage at Phan Fa while we were eating the noodles today.

Again, violence won.

I think of the faces of the people I met today. The image of young soldiers, still in their teens, resting during the retreat time. Some lay down to rest, others ate bread and sodas given by the people. One of them used a pink telephone to talk to someone. I saw several of them doing the same, not just one. They probably called people who were worried about them. Like me, my mom called with concern, “Be careful of the tear gas.”

I thought of another woman in red. She rode a motorcycle into the protest area in a hurry. She said she was looking for her mom. The woman said she put on her red shirt and left home in a hurry when her mom called to say she was there. She didn’t come to take her mom home. She came to be with her mom at the demonstration.

Another woman I thought of was someone who was stuck in her sedan on the way down from Pin Klao Bridge. The road ahead of her was blocked off and the guard wouldn’t let anyone pass because the soldiers were coming in. She probably wasn’t there to join protest, she was just passing by. The soldiers whose trucks were also stuck on the bridge started to come down by the hundreds. The woman asked me if she should leave her car behind. I didn’t think the situation looked good so I told her to leave. I saw the fear in her eyes but I didn’t know what more I could do for her.

I saw the red-shirt protesters shouting in front of the soldiers, “soldiers are our brothers”, “soldiers are I-san people like us”. I saw the protesters handing cold drinks to the soldiers who were sweating from the heat. I heard another protester shouting, “We have gone beyond fear”.

A young soldier told me that he just got the order and just arrived at the protest site. He didn’t know what was going to happen and didn’t know how the night would end.

Another red-shirt student, probably the same age as the soldier with the pink phone, told me about the confrontation with the soldiers. There was fear in his/her voice. S/he asked me to take her/him across the soldier lines to join the friends on the outside. S/he held my hand tightly while we walked pass the soldiers.

I saw the color that each person was wearing and I saw the person under each color. These are people who have love, fear, anger and hope.

The later the night, the higher the death toll, which includes soldiers, protesters, journalists and bystanders.

Tomorrow i will return to the hospital again.

Dharma in Action: Colombia

Posted on

Colombian Children (photo from BPF)

The Buddhist Peace Fellowship and the Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR) are seeking a Buddhist practitioner for an exciting new project — the “Dharma in Action Fellowship.” This person would:

…join the FOR team to carry out nonviolent protective accompaniment to threatened activists in Colombia, while exploring the relationship between Buddhism and activism during one year of service in the field. The volunteer will carry out human rights protective accompaniment in Bogotá or the rural community of San José de Apartadó…

The Dharma in Action Fellow would be responsible for communicating reflections on the relationship between Buddhism and activism through a socially engaged listserve and/or a personal blog and upon completion of service will give a speaking tour, visiting Buddhist centers in the US to talk about his/her experience and insights while on the team in Colombia.

You can find out more about requirements and how to apply here.

Bearing Witness in Gaza

Posted on

Emerging from my holiday blogging break, because this seems like an important story to share.

If you haven’t yet heard about it, over the past few days a long-planned Gaza Peace March has been gathering in Cairo, Egypt, to walk in solidarity with Palestinian people and to call for an end to the siege of that territory. However, out of the 1,400 people who have come to march (many of them faith leaders), only 100 were being allowed across the border by the Egyptian government.

One of those people is angel Kyodo williams, who is currently on sabbatical from her role as director of the New Dharma Community and the Center for Transformative Change. angel is a Zen Buddhist priest and the author of Being Black: Zen and the Art of Living with Fearlessness and Grace.

In the post below, angel writes about the on-the-ground challenges of being a peacemaker.  I bow to her courage and willingness to look deeply at her own intentions in a very heated situation, and for exploring what it means to be peace. These are her words:

********************

northern Sinai, Egypt. 7:50pm [posted Dec. 30, 2009]

here we are on the road to Gaza.

i am one of what ended up being 65. i was included in the original 100. i got the news that I was selected last night at 9pm. “pack your bags” my friend and coordinator of the media team said. “you’re on the list. you’re going.”

when they held a meeting to tell everyone, obviously it did not go down easily for many people for many different reasons. over 1300 people impossiblly pared down to 100. and with only two hours to decide and make the selections. it could never be satisfactory. finally and still, we the 100 were to meet two buses at 7am.

we packed. wrote last email. some of us slept and woke again. but when we left our rooms at 6:15am, we were met with the news that the organizing team decided they’d made the wrong call in accepting the 100-person proposal without being able to consult everyone, etc. they were very sorry for the pain and challenge it had caused. so we would go to the bus, this perspective of the organizers would be shared and whoever still wanted to go would go.

long story short, the left thing happened. the people that felt we should all go or none of us should go began tactic after tactic to convince people they should not go. that they should get off the bus. that the foreign minister issued a statement saying the 100 chosen were selected because they were not dangerous but the remaining were. that the people would not want us to come. that the entire movement–all of the years of work–would be destroyed if we went.

it was not a conversation. it was not thoughtful. it was not nonviolent.

over the next 3 hours, much shuffling occurred. people getting off the bus. people getting on. people screaming that everyone should get on, screaming that everyone should get off. people just screaming. a few people took turns holding up a hastily scrawled sign that said “Get off the buses. Do you think 100 people represent 1400 Palestinians dead?”

very few of the people that had made it through the passport check already were firm all the way through. neither firmly on nor firmly off. there were a handful, though, that for whatever their reasons–and they were varied–knew without a doubt that they intended to go.

Zainab Salbi, the Iraqi author and leader for women offered, in a dignified and repectful way, “if you are here for humanitarian reasons, you should stay on. if you are here for political reasons, you should get off. they are both right.”

from the time I knew there was unsureness about whether fewer than all should go, I knew that if the bus went, I would go. if not, I would not.

looking into the ony heart that knows, I realize, with all the complexity, that I am not here for reasons humanitarian or political in the conventional sense. I am here by the call of Spirit. I am here as a priest. I am here in my role as a fellow human being Bearing Witness to what too much of the world has ignored for far too long.

so given the choice, if it were at all possible, I would bear this witness with my own eyes, being and heart.

having been a witness, perhaps my Jewish colleagues will no longer send me email telling of how well Palestinians are faring. perhaps when the debates are riddled with charecatuers and hyperbole about either Palestinians or Israelis, I will have the trust of my own, undoubtedly limited experience. perhaps i can be a credible voice that contributes to the voices raised for truth, even if that truth is just my own. and…perhaps the people will not want us there as was suggested by the off-Busers. be that so, I will Bear Witness to that, too.

what I bore witness to today was the hypocrisy that lives in our hearts when we speak of nonviolence, when we speak of choice, when we speak of basic respect. but I rest assured that my crossing the border to say “you are not forgotten” will not destroy a movement towards what we all–humanitarian, political, spiritual–wish for, to see the Gazan people, and through them all people, Thrive.

so I am ON the bus, and on a now-Splintered Road to Gaza. but my heart and my spirit are whole.

salaam.

ps, we just became 75. ten of some 30-odd folks that had come to Al-Arish hoping to get across the border but ending up on house arrest in a hotel were just transferred to our 2nd bus.

Quote of the Week: Shakyamuni Buddha

Posted on

Yes, this week’s quote is from the original engaged Buddhist, Siddhartha himself. This time we’ll leave out the bio, as I think you know who he is. Here’s the quote, as it appears in the Dhammapada:

“Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love; this is the eternal rule.”

To go off on a little side road — a few weeks ago one of the big news stories was President Obama’s acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize. In his otherwise gracious acceptance speech, the president said, “A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler’s armies.” This is an argument that many people make when they talk about the possibility of nonviolence as a force for change in the world.

Michael Nagler, a scholar at UC Berkeley and founder of the Metta Center for Nonviolence, does a great job in explaining the holes in this argument and telling the story of a nonviolent resistance action in Germany during World War II that actually did work in this post on Yes! Magazine’s website.

So it seems that Siddhartha was on to something. Nonviolence is not easy, it’s not magic, but it can and has worked in the course of history.

****************

Blog news: I’m taking a little time off from writing the rest of this week to re-charge my batteries. When I return, I’ll be getting ready to participate in a “Buddhist Blog Swap.” I’ll be doing a guest post on Adam Johnson’s blog “Home Brew Dharma” and my blog will be honored to post an entry by Shane Hennesy, the author of the blog “Zenfant.” Should be fun!

Have a wonderful. peaceful new year!

___________________________________

If you enjoyed this post, I invite you to visit my other website: The Liberated Life Project — a personal transformation blog with a social conscience.

 

What Does Socially Engaged Buddhism Look Like?

Posted on

Here’s one possibility. This one comes from nearly three years ago, January 2007, when about 300 people came together to form a “Buddhist Peace Delegation” as part of a much larger march in Washington D.C. to call for an end to the war in Iraq. Approximately 500,000 people walked for peace that day, though it received little media coverage. I helped to organize the Buddhist delegation, along with my friend and writer Louise Dunlap and others, and it was one of the most inspiring few days of my life.

Our delegation was comprised of Buddhist of all stripes — Pure Land, SGI, Zen, Theravadin, Tibetan — as well as people in the march who gravitated toward us because of the noticeably different energy that emanated from our participants. We had a group of kids leading the delegation, and one of us rang a bell of mindfulness every so often to remind us all to stop a take a breath.

On another day of the weekend long action, a small group of us visited the offices of several Senators and Representatives to have a dialogue about the war. I always remember one of Sen. Harry Reid’s aides telling us that even though the Senator didn’t agree with our request to de-fund the war, it was important that we were out there marching and holding that position because it gave him more leverage to negotiate a more moderate position (gradual withdrawl of troops).

This video was put together by Paul Davis, a photographer, Vietnam vet, and member of the Cincinnati Buddhist Peace Fellowship chapter.

Veterans’ Day

Posted on

Today is Veterans’ Day in the U.S., Remembrance Day in Australia — a day to honor soldiers of wars past.

There are some who believe that it’s wrong for people who practice Buddhism to have anything to do with the military. In moving toward a socially engaged Buddhism beyond labels, I would suggest that it’s not useful to label any person or institution as inherently “bad,” “evil,” or “violent.” Everything has both wholesome and unwholesome seeds, including the military.

There’s much more to be said about this which I’ll write about another time, but for now I join with others in remembering all those in the Armed Forces who gave their lives in the service of protecting others.

And a few links:

First, a couple of Buddhist-oriented programs and projects that offer support to military vets. I’m sure there are more, and would love to hear from you if you have resources to add to this list.

  • The Coming Home Project, founded by Zen teacher Joseph Bobrow, is devoted to providing compassionate expert care, support, education, and stress management tools for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, service members, their families, and their service providers.
  • The website for Veterans of War, Veterans of Peace, based on a book by Maxine Hong Kingston. For many years, Kingston has led writing retreats for veterans to help them find their voices as part of the process of healing from the wounds of war. This page has some wonderful resources on how to start a veterans’ writing group.

 

And — collection of today’s relevant writings on this topic from Buddhist bloggers:

Buddhist Military Sangha Blog entry by Lt Jeanette Shin, CHC USN

One City Buddhist Blog “A Minute of Silence”

Rev Danny Fisher’s Blog “5 Facts about Veterans and How You Can Help”

 

 

 

 

Buddhist Chaplains in the Military?

Posted on

buddist-2

There’s been a lively conversation going on the past few weeks in the Upaya Zen Center’s enewsletter, centering around the question of Buddhist chaplains in the U.S. military, and more generally Buddhist involvement in the military. The stream of dialogue is a great example of how I see a “socially engaged Buddhism beyond labels” taking shape.

It started with the Oct 19 posting of a piece by Hozan Alan Senauke (of The Clear View Project). Alan works with a group, including Lt. Jeanette Shin, to create materials for the more than 5,000 Buddhists who currently serve in the U.S. armed forces. He summarized some of the questions/challenges that the group is faced with:

Is it truly possible to keep the first precept, not taking life? I was asked whether I thought all military and police were “immoral.” What about the military of “Buddhist” nations like Japan, Thailand, Sri Lanka? Were conscientious objectors using Buddhism as a pretext for escaping the military, or whether these were serious practitioners. And then, am I substituting my personal sense of morality for another, and is this itself transgressing the Buddha’s precepts?

There’s much more to ponder in his excellent post, and I encourage you to read the entire article. One of the conclusions Alan comes to is around “not knowing:”

I confess to not knowing about the absolute application of nonviolence. I come to nonviolence because I am aware of the violence within me and find that its use has never worked out well for me or those affected by it. But in the face of a totalitarian regime, Burma for example, nonviolence has been crushed again and again. I believe it will triumph in time. But meanwhile, I have never counseled Burmese activists or ethnic groups simply to throw away their weapons. I do not judge them, nor would I or have I hesitated to offer them spiritual words. But the disproportionality of resources and guns in the hands of the Burmese military doesn’t make a good argument for armed insurrection.

Nor do I pretend to know the “best policy” for our country in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Total withdrawal? What will come of that? More troops, what will come of that? Sometimes one has implacable enemies, who control their own people with fear. (One could argue that is how the U.S. government has tried to control its own people these last eight years.) How does one stand up against this implacable wish to do harm? So now we have a tangled mess.

The next week, Gerald Virtbauer, a Buddhist scholar and psychologist from Austria, began his response with this:

I have been following the implementation of the first Buddhist chaplain in the US forces in the media the last weeks, as well with mixed feelings. I think it is, indeed, an unholy alliance and there would be the chance for Western Zen Buddhists to clearly state that this kind of history of aligning Buddhism with military needs should not be continued to be written in the Western context.

Gerald’s full response can be found here.

And then the week after, Shari Naismith, a former police office who will be starting Upaya’s Buddhist Chaplaincy Program next year, responded as well. An excerpt:

As I understand it, (and forgive me as I am new to Buddhism), the main thread to Buddhist thought is “compassion in entirety”. Leaving nothing out. Then, as I understand it, (again, forgive me if I am wrong), the main thread in being a Buddhist Chaplain is using this found state of being, lets call it “living compassion”, and taking that inner state to those in suffering. Am I off base here?

Then I ask, why would a Buddhist Chaplain, (maybe even any Buddhist for that matter), want to separate oneself from ANY organization that is clearly producing large amounts of suffering?

Shari’s full response is here.

I think the important thing here is how each of them are turning over this question in a spirit of wholehearted inquiry. It brings up the even bigger question of compassion, and how each of us defines it. There is no one answer, nor should there be.

What do you think?